![]() These individuals should fully meet the criteria for authorship.Īcquisition of funding, collection of data, or general supervision of the research group alone does not constitute authorship, although all contributors who do not meet the criteria for authorship should be listed in the Acknowledgments section. When a large, multicentre group has conducted the work, the group should identify the individuals who accept direct responsibility for the manuscript. Each author should have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for appropriate portions of the content. Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.Īuthors should meet the conditions of all of the points above.Drafted the article or revised it critically for important intellectual content.Made a substantial contribution to the concept or design of the work or acquisition, analysis or interpretation of data.The list of authors should include all those who can legitimately claim authorship. Those submitting papers should carefully check that all those whose work contributed to the paper are acknowledged as contributing authors. Please note that the journal’s editors are not obliged to invite any recommended/opposed reviewers to assess your manuscript.įor authors submitting to technical or medical journals, papers should only be submitted for consideration once consent is given by all contributing authors. Gmail/Yahoo/Hotmail) email account and an institutional email account cannot be found after performing a basic Google search (name, department and institution). The reviewer has provided a personal (e.g.The author has recommended the reviewer.The reviewer is based at the funding body of the paper.The reviewer is based at the same institution as any of the co-authors.Our policy is that reviewers should not be assigned to a paper if: Reviewers should be experts in their fields and should be able to provide an objective assessment of the manuscript. Sage does not permit the use of author-suggested (recommended) reviewers at any stage of the submission process, be that through the web-based submission system or other communication. Please see the submission guidelines of the journal you wish to submit to. If you can answer ‘yes’ to most of their questions then you can be confident that your chosen journal is easily discoverable with a suitable reputation. Think, check, submit is a trusted online service with a useful checklist that will help you determine whether you are submitting to the right journal. Sage is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and follows their best practice guidelines.įor authors submitting to medical journals, Sage recommends that authors follow the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals formulated by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE).Īre you choosing the right journal for your research? With so many journals to choose from you may need a little guidance… Please direct queries on the submission process to the journal’s editorial office details can be found within each journal’s submission guidelines and further information can be found at our Journals Solutions portal. Please be sure to read your chosen journal’s guidelines as each journal will have its own specific requirements. Our general guidance for authors can be found below. ![]() To submit your article, visit your chosen journal’s homepage and click on the manuscript submission guidelines link. Each Sage journal has its own editorial office and its own instructions for authors. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |